#Targets platform by qobuz streaming to movie#
#Targets platform by qobuz streaming to pro#
#Targets platform by qobuz streaming to tv#

What really counts is that the tracks that you want to hear are on the service. When you have 40 or 70 million tracks, 30 or 50 million of them are going to be pretty obscure. i am sure that a similar figure exists for other streaming service.

A few years ago Spotify revealed that 80% of the tracks held on its servers were never accessed. In fact most of those tracks for either service will never be accessed by anybody. You will never in your life listen to 40 or 70 million different tracks. Consider augmenting your streaming subscription by supporting artists in other ways.Well I am afraid that the points you make do not really add up.įirstly when you reach 40 million or 70 million tracks these become meaningless numbers for the consumer.

Those acts are seeing pennies on their streaming statements.Ĭancelling all your streaming accounts is one solution, but that doesn’t really help artists or songwriters, either. Things are much different for emerging artists, your old favorites from 90s alternative rock, or hip hop. If you’re an artist at the top of the charts-Taylor Swift or The Weeknd, or one of the best-loved catalog acts (The Beatles or Led Zeppelin)-streaming royalties are a lucrative source of income. The overwhelming majority of streams at all the music services are from a handful of current hit acts.

#Targets platform by qobuz streaming to tv#

And that’s not even counting the live TV content you can’t get with just a TV antenna. If you subscribed to Netflix ($15.49), Disney+ ($8), Prime Video ($8.99), HBO Max ($14.99), Paramount+ ($4.99), Apple TV+ ($4.99), Hulu ($6.99), Peacock ($4.99), Showtime ($10.99), Criterion Channel ($9.99), Starz ($8.99), and Epix ($5.99), you’d be at just over $105 per month and still have just a sliver of all the movies and shows available to rent or buy in digital format.

#Targets platform by qobuz streaming to movie#

If you have issues with the big companies in the streaming world, you can consider those services as genuine alternatives.Ĭompare music streaming to movie and television services. They’re still corporate entities looking to turn a profit, but they’ve staked out a position where success or failure is based entirely on their ability to deliver a quality listening experience. Tidal, Qobuz, and Deezer are music-only companies. Their moves into podcasting and content creation have created controversies that have already had some negative impact on their image and business, as several artists and podcasters have removed their work from the platform. Spotify has looked for ways to compete with these deeper pockets since the company went public. They might even be using their music streaming services as a loss leader. The advantage that Apple, Amazon, and Google-owned YouTube enjoy is that music is only one of their revenue streams, so their success doesn’t depend on profits gleaned from streaming music. Since approximately 70 percent of your subscription dollar is passed through to music publishers and copyright holders, all music streamers are operating on thin margins. I used Focal Celestee over-ear headphones for all my high-resolution listening. I used both a Dragonfly Red and an iFi hip-dac2 as a DAC (digital-to-analog converter), connecting the to the iPhone using the standard workaround with an Apple Lightning to USB 3 Camera Adapter.

#Targets platform by qobuz streaming to pro#

For high-resolution streaming, I used a 2021 MacBook Air with an M1 chip and an iPhone 13 Pro Max.